Short Communications
2014 June
Volume : 2 Issue : 2


Recent advances in the management of bladder cancer

Jayanth Reddy

Pdf Page Numbers :- 128-130

Jayanth Reddy1,*

 

1 Department of Urology, Krishna Institute of Medical sciences, Minister Road, Secunderabad - 500003, AP, India

 

*Corresponding author: Dr. Jayanth Reddy, Department of Urology, Krishna Institute of Medical sciences, Minister Road, Secunderabad - 500003, AP, India. Email: vjr_103@yahoo.co.in

 

Received 14 February 2014; Revised 15 March 2014; Accepted 22 March 2014

 

Citation: Jayanth Reddy. Recent advances in the management of bladder cancer. J Med Sci Res 2014; 2(2):128-130. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17727/JMSR.2014/2-023  

 

Copyright: © 2014 Jayanth Reddy. Published by KIMS Foundation and Research Center. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



Abstract

Bladder cancer is the commonest malignancy of the urinary tract. Various alternatives have been investigated, either to reduce the frequency of cystoscopy, or improve its sensitivity for detection of tumors. These include urine-based markers, Narrow-band imaging and photodynamic diagnosis/blue-light cystoscopy. Recent developments in post-resection intravesical regimens for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer are discussed. For patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, both laparoscopic radical cystectomy and robot-assisted radical cystectomy have been shown to reduce peri-operative morbidity, while being oncologically equivalent to open radical cystectomy. Bladder-preserving strategies entail resection and chemoradiation, and in selected patients give equivalent results to surgery. These newer approaches are also discussed

 

Keywords: bladder cancer; urine-based markers; Narrow-band imaging; photodynamic diagnosis

Full Text

 Introduction

Bladder cancer is the commonest malignancy of the urinary tract, with the incidence being four times higher in men than in women (1). Much has changed in the diagnosis and management of bladder cancer over the past 5 to 10 years.

 

Classification 

The WHO grading of bladder cancer has changed, with the 2004 grading system incorporating a range of histological descriptions such as urothelial papilloma (completely benign lesion), papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (PUNLMP), and low-grade and high-grade cancer, rather than the previous three grades of well (G1), moderately (G2) or poorly differentiated (G3) papillary urothelial carcinoma (2). The TNM (tumor, node, and metastasis) classification has generally remained the same.

 

Diagnosis

Cystoscopy and urine cytology are the most important tools in the diagnosis and follow-up of bladder cancer.

 

Newer modalities

Urinary markers: Several urinary biomarkers {NMP-22, BTA Immunoassay etc.} are available and are  FDA approved, but no single marker has sufficient sensitivity and specificity to replace cystoscopy (3).

 

Point –of- care tests: Narrow-band imaging (4) and photodynamic diagnosis/blue-light cystoscopy (5) have shown promise in improving detection and reducing recurrence of bladder tumors, by improving the completion of bladder resection when compared with standard resection in white light. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) can be used to detect urinary cells that have chromosomal abnormalities consistent with a diagnosis of bladder cancer (6).

 

Treatment

At presentation, 75–80 % of patients are diagnosed with non-muscle-invasive Tumours (NMIBC: stages Ta, T1 and Tcis), while 20 to 25 % are diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC, stages T2–4).

 

Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) is the first-line treatment for patients with NMIBC. Unfortunately, the high rate of recurrence and progression after TURBT necessitates the use of adjuvant treatments (7). A single dose of intravesical chemotherapy given after TURBT on the same day significantly reduced the odds of tumor recurrence by 39% in patients with tumors with a low risk of recurrence and progressio (8). Intravesical BCG is the standard treatment for high-grade NMIBC and CIS, and should be given as a maintenance schedul (9).

 

Intravesical BCG followed by electromotive drug administration of mitomycin C (EMDA-MMC) given to patients with high-risk superficial bladder led to higher disease-free interval, lower recurrence and progression rates, and improved overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DFS) rates, compared with BCG alone(10).

 

Muscle invasive bladder cancer

Minimally invasive techniques in radical cystectomy (11, 12): Open radical cystectomy (ORC) is the current gold-standard treatment for MIBC and for high-risk recurrent NMIBC. Ideally, all patients with MIBC should receive platinum-based neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (13, 14). Open radical cystectomy has a peri-operative complication rate of 25 to 62% (15). Therefore, minimally invasive techniques like laparoroscopic radical cystectomy and robot assisted radical cystectomy have been explored.

 

The advantages of laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) & robot assisted radical cystectomy(RARC) include decreased blood loss, reduced postoperative pain, early return of bowel function, and shorter hospital stay (16). Most urologists performing LRC or RARC advocate performing the cystectomy and LN dissection intracorporeally, with subsequent extracorporeal urinary diversion via a lower midline incision. Increasing experience has enabled intra-corporeal reconstruction of urinary diversion, whether this is by ileal conduit or orthotopic neobladder formation (17).

 

Bladder preservation (18)

Combined multi-modal therapy in the form of concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy and radiotherapy after maximal TURBT achieves complete response and preserves the native bladder in more than 70% of patients, while offering long-term survival rates comparable with contemporary cystectomy series (19).This approach could be a good alternative to radical surgery in selected patients with muscle-invasive disease.

 

Conclusions

Technological advances have enabled enhanced cystoscopy, with BLC increasing detection of bladder tumors and improving quality of tumor resection. Although many types of urinary markers have been explored, as yet none  exists with sufficient specificity or sensitivity to replace regular cystoscopic surveillance of NMIBC. Various intravesical therapies for NMIBC have been investigated, including MMC-HT(Hyperthermic mitomycin C), BCG in combination with EMDA-MMC. Minimally invasive radical cystectomy has been increasing in popularity over the past 10 years. For patients who prefer bladder preservation, TURBT with combination chemotherapy and radiotherapy regimens has shown  similar outcomes to radical surgery.

 

Conflict of Interest

The author wish to express that he has no conflict of interest.

 

References

1. Ploeg M, Aben KK, Kiemeney LA. The present and future burden of urinary bladder cancer in the world. World J Urol. 2009; 27(3):289-293.

2. Epstein JI, Amin MB, Reuter VR, Mostofi FK. The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder. Bladder Consensus Conference Committee. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998; 22(12):1435-1448.

3. Yutkin V, Nisman B, Pode D. Can urinary biomarkers replace cystoscopic examination in bladder cancer surveillance? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2010; 10(6):787-790.

4. Herr HW, Donat SM. A comparison of white-light cystoscopy and narrow-band imaging cystoscopy to detect bladder tumour recurrences. BJU Int. 2008; 102(9):1111-1114.

5. Witjes JA1, Redorta JP, Jacqmin D, Sofras F, Malmström PU, et al. Hexaminolevulinate-guided fluorescence cystoscopy in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: review of the evidence and recommendations. Eur Urol. 2010; 57(4):607-614.

6. Junker K, Boerner D, Schulze W, Utting M, Schubert J, et al. Analysis of genetic alterations in normal bladder urothelium. Urology. 2003; 62(6):1134-1138.

7. Lerner SP, Au JL. Risk- adapted use of intravesical chemotherapy. BJU Int. 2008b; 102(9 Pt B):1247-1253.

8. Sylvester RJ, Oosterlinck W, van der Meijden AP. A single immediate postoperative instillation of chemotherapy decreases the risk of recurrence in patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of published results of randomized clinical trials. J Urol. 2004; 171(6 Pt 1):2186-2190.

9. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Lamm DL. Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin reduces the risk of progression in patients with superficial bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of the published results of randomized clinical trials. J Urol. 2002; 168(5):1964-1970.

10. Di Stasi SM, Giannantoni A, Giurioli A, Valenti M, Zampa G, et al. Sequential BCG and electromotive mitomycin versus BCG alone for high-risk superficial bladder cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006; 7(1):43-51.

11. Gill IS, Kaouk JH, Meraney AM, Desai MM, Ulchaker JC, et al. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy and continent orthotopic ileal neobladder performed completely intracorporeally: the initial experience. J Urol. 2002; 168(1):13-18.

12. Nix J, Smith A, Kurpad R, Nielsen ME, Wallen EM, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results. Eur Urol. 2010; 57(2):196-201.

13. Advanced Bladder Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2003 7; 361(9373):1927-1934.

14. Grossman HB, Natale RB, Tangen CM, Speights VO, Vogelzang NJ, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003 28; 349(9):859-866.

15. Novotny V, Hakenberg OW, Wiessner D, Heberling U, Litz RJ, et al. Perioperative complications of radical cystectomy in a contemporary series. Eur Urol. 2007; 51(2):397-401

16. Haber GP, Crouzet S, Gill IS. Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a critical analysis. Eur Urol 2008; 54:54-62.

17. Pruthi RS, Nix J, McRackan D, Hickerson A, Nielsen ME, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic intracorporeal urinary diversion. Eur Urol. 2010; 57(6):1013-1021.

18. James ND, Hussain SA, Hall E, Jenkins P, Tremlett J, et al. Radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. N Engl J Med 2012; 366:1477-1488.

19. Efstathiou JA, Spiegel DY, Shipley WU, Heney NM, Kaufman DS, et al. Long-term outcomes of selective bladder preservation by combined-modality therapy for invasive bladder cancer: the MGH experience. Eur Urol. 2012; 61(4):705-711.

 

Subscription