Orginal Research
2024 March
Volume : 12 Issue : 1


Candida species in catheter associated urinary tract infection in ICU patients at a tertiary care hospital in North India: An observational study

Singhal E, Singh R, Bhardwaj P, Kumari M

Pdf Page Numbers :- 11-15

Esha Singhal1, Rashmi Singh2, Prashant Bhardwaj3, and Manjari Kumari4,*

 

1Department of Microbiology, Rajshree Medical Research Institute, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243501, India

2Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Badaun, Uttar Pradesh 243601, India

3Department of Pathology, Veerangana Avanti Bai Lodhi Autonomous State Medical College, Etah, Uttar Pradesh 207001, India

4Department of Pharmacology, Veerangana Avanti Bai Lodhi Autonomous State Medical College, Etah, Uttar Pradesh 207001, India

 

*Corresponding author: Dr. Manjari Kumari, Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Veerangana Avanti Bai Lodhi, Autonomous State Medical College, Etah, Uttar Pradesh 207001, India. Email: manjarikumari164@gmail.com

 

Received 7 September 2023; Revised 31 October 2023; Accepted 10 November 2023; Published 18 November 2023

 

Citation: Singhal E, Singh R, Bhardwaj P, Kumari M. Candida species in catheter associated urinary tract infection in ICU patients at a tertiary care hospital in North India: An observational study. J Med Sci Res. 2024; 12(1):11-15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17727/JMSR.2024/12-2

 

Copyright: © 2024 Singhal E et al. Published by KIMS Foundation and Research Center. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



Abstract

Introduction: Catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is most common nosocomial infection which constitutes ~80% of nosocomial urinary tract infections (UTIs). Candida albicans has been most commonly isolated in past but in recent years non-albicans candida has emerged as the more common agent causing UTI in ICU settings. The study aimed to assess the burden of various candida species in symptomatic CAUTI in ICU patients and to test their susceptibility pattern for various antifungal agents.

Materials and methods: Study was performed at a 1050 bed tertiary care hospital of northern India. Over a period of 1 year, total 147 urine samples from symptomatic CAUTI patients admitted in ICU were collected. Gram’s staining and culture on CLED agar was done. All yeast isolates were tested for speciation of Candida & antifungal susceptibility by an automated commercial system - VITEK 2.

Results: Among 147 urine samples, 34 (23.12%) were positive for various Candida species. 61.76% positive patients were female and 38.23% were male. Maximum numbers of Candida isolates were found in above 60 years age group. 27 (79.41%) were due to non-albicans Candida spp. and 7 (20.58%) were due to Candida albicans. All Candida species were found to be sensitive to voriconazole, amphotericin B, caspofungin and micafungin. Few isolates of certain species like C.albicans and C.non-albicans showed resistance to fluconazole and/or flucytosine.

Conclusion: Changing pattern of Candida species causing UTIs around the world points towards continuous need for surveillance, thus helping us in providing appropriate therapy.

 

Keywords: Candida albicans; Candida non-albicans; urinary tract infections

Full Text

Introduction

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most commonly diagnosed infections in both hospital & community settings [1-3]. They are classified into upper and lower urinary tract infections. These can either be asymptomatic or symptomatic [4, 5]. Nosocomial infections are ones which develop in hospitalized patients, were neither present nor in incubation at the time of patient’s admission & approximately 40% of such infections are preventable [6].

 

Most common nosocomial infection is Catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) which constitutes about 80% of nosocomial urinary tract infections (UTIs) [7]. Among all the bacterial & fungal agents causative of UTI, incidence of fungal UTIs have been increasing in recent years [1, 8, 9] and more so in the ICU settings [10]. Predisposing factors being instrumentation of urinary tract, prolonged broad-spectrum antibiotic usage, diabetes mellitus, immunosuppressive drugs, extremes of age, AIDS, surgeries, and female gender [4, 5, 11, 12]. Indwelling devices/ catheters are of significance because in hospitalized patients they are very commonly associated with biofilm formation which is inherently resistant to antifungals like amphotericin B and fluconazole [13]. A catheterised patient having candiduria presenting along with symptoms & signs of UTI is considered as symptomatic CAUTI [11].

 

103 Colony Forming Units per millilitre (CFU/mL) to 105 CFU/mL is the acceptable count of bacteriuria/ candiduria in ICU patients to consider CAUTI [11]. Candida albicans has been most commonly isolated opportunistic pathogenic fungi from cases of UTI in the past [1, 14, 15]. In recent years non-albicans candida has emerged as more common agent causing UTI in ICU settings [16, 17]. Candida species constitute almost 10-15% of nosocomial UTIs [18, 19]. As far as the choice of antifungals is considered, it is difficult to decide because many antifungals attain a low urinary concentration and some of the candida species show inherent resistance to certain antifungals [20, 21]. This calls for antifungal susceptibility testing and species identification of candida. Hence an aggressive approach in the diagnosis & management of such patients can help in preventing disseminated candidiasis [22].

 

This study aimed to assess the significance of various candida species in symptomatic CAUTI in ICU patients and test their susceptibility to various antifungal agents.

 

Materials and methods

Study was performed in a 1050 bed at Rajshree Medical Research Institute, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh after taking ethical committee approval. This was a prospective observational study conducted over a period of 1 year (January 2022 to December 2022). During this period 147 urine samples were collected from cases of symptomatic CAUTI in ICU patients.

 

Male and female patients of age ≥18 years were considered for this study. Those who had UTI after 48 hours of hospitalization & were put on Foley’s catheter were included in the study. Only those yeast isolates which showed pure growth with significant colony count were included in the study.

 

Patients who were catheterised before being admitted in ICU, whose Foley’s catheter was removed or who were discharged before 48 hours of being catheterised were not included in this study. Urine samples where Candida species was isolated without any pyuria, colony count was <103 CFU/ml and growth were polymicrobial were also excluded from the study [11].

 

Urine samples were collected from Foley’s catheter using aseptic technique, and a minimum of 3ml of urine was taken in a screw capped, sterile, leak proof container. They were transported within 1 hour to microbiology laboratory. Sample was taken on 1st day to rule out any prior UTI. Then sample collection was done on 3rd, 5th, 7th, 10th, 14th day and then weekly till catheter was removed, or patient developed candiduria, or was discharged/ died [7, 12].

 

Gram staining of uncentrifuged urine was done to look for the presence of candida. Then sample was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 3-5 minutes and wet mount of sediment was made. Pus cells/ HPF were counted under 40x objective lens. If >5 WBCs/HPF were found it was considered as significant for diagnosing CAUTI [7, 23]. Each sample was inoculated on Cysteine Lactose Electrolyte Deficient (CLED) agar by semi-quantitative method using calibrated wire loop technique according to standard protocol. This delivered 0.001ml of urine sample to the culture plate. These plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours aerobically and then were checked for any growth [7, 24, 25]. If any pure growth was found then Gram’s staining was done to look for Gram positive budding yeast cells and pseudohyphae.

 

All yeast isolates were stored for further speciation of Candida spp. & antifungal susceptibility testing by an automated commercial system (VITEK 2, bioMe’rieux, Marcy d’Etoile, France) were reported for fluconazole, voriconazole, caspofungin, micafungin, amphotericin B and flucytosine.

 

Patients were diagnosed as symptomatic CAUTI as per Centre for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines January, 2014. This included UTI caused by Candida spp., with a culture of ≥103 CFU/ml for a specimen collected at least 48 hrs after hospital admission and a previous negative urine culture for Candida spp. [11].

 

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS soft- ware version 24 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows 24.0, Armonk, NY, IBM Corp.). Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Pearson’s Chi-square test was done for comparison of categorical variables. Value of p≤0.05 were considered statistically significant along with the 95% confidence interval for the test statistic was computed.

 

Results

In this study total 147 ICU patients developed symptomatic CAUTI, of them 81 were male and 66 were female. Out of these 34 (23.12%) were caused by various Candida species. Majority 27 (79.41%) were due to non-albicans Candida spp. and 7 (20.58%) were due to Candida albicans. The prevalence of non- albicans Candida spp. was 18.37% which one was much higher than the Candida albicans spp. (4.76%) with p value of 0.000265 (Table 1). Species of non-albicans Candida isolated were Candida tropicalis, Candida krusei, Candida kefyr, Candida parapsilosis, Candida glabrata, Candida intermedia and Candida guilliermondii. Candida species were isolated more commonly from female patients (61.76%) as compared to male patients (38.23%) (Table 2).

 

Table 1: Prevalence of Candida albicans and Candida non-albicans associated urinary tract infection in ICU patient. 

Candida species

Prevalence

p value

Candida albicans spp.

4.76%

0.000265

Candida non-albicans spp.

18.36%

Total

23.12%

 

Table 2: Gender wise distribution of different Candida species in urine samples.  

Candida species

Males

Females

Total no. of isolates (%)

C. albicans

3

4

7 (20.58%)

C. tropicalis

2

4

6 (17.64%)

C. krusei

2

3

5 (14.70%)

C. kefyr

1

2

3 (8.82%)

C. parapsilosis

1

1

2 (5.88%)

C. glabrata

0

2

2 (5.88%)

C. intermedia

2

3

5 (14.70%)

C. guilliermondii

2

2

4 (11.76%)

Total

13 (38.23%)

21 (61.76%)

34 (100%)

 

The total prevalence of CAUTI in this study was 23.12%, of which prevalence among female patients was significantly higher (31.12%) as compared to males (16.05%) with p value of 0.0247 (Table 3). Maximum number of Candida isolates were found in above 60 years age group (Table 4).

 

Table 3: Prevalence of Candida associated urinary tract infection in ICU patient. 

 

Prevalence

p value

Male

16.05%

0.0247

Female

31.81%

Total

23.12%

 

Table 4: Candida isolates age-wise distribution in urine samples.  

Age groups (years)

Males

Females

18-30

4

7

31-45

2

3

46-60

2

2

>60

5

9

Total

13

21

 

Observation of the susceptibility pattern of various species of Candida for different antifungals revealed that all Candida species were found to be sensitive to voriconazole, amphotericin B, caspofungin and micafungin. Few isolates of certain species like C.albicans and non-albicans Candida (C.tropicalis, C.krusei, C.intermedia and C.glabrata) showed resistance to fluconazole and/or flucytosine (Table 5).

 

Table 5: Antifungal susceptibility pattern for all the Candida isolates in this study.

 

Candida spp.

Fluconazole

Voriconazole

Caspofungin

Micafungin

Amphotericin-B

Flucytocine

C.albicans

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.albicans

R

S

S

S

S

S

C.albicans

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.albicans

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.albicans

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.albicans

R

S

S

S

S

S

C.albicans

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.tropicalis

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.tropicalis

R

S

S

S

S

S

C.tropicalis

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.tropicalis

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.tropicalis

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.tropicalis

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.krusei

R

S

S

S

S

R

C.krusei

R

S

S

S

S

R

C.krusei

R

S

S

S

S

S

C.krusei

R

S

S

S

S

S

C.krusei

R

S

S

S

S

S

C.kefyr

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.kefyr

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.kefyr

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.parapsilosis

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.parapsilosis

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.intermedia

S

S

S

S

S

R

C.intermedia

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.intermedia

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.intermedia

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.intermedia

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.guillermondii

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.guillermondii

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.guillermondii

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.guillermondii

S

S

S

S

S

S

C.glabrata

R

S

S

S

S

S

C.glabrata

R

S

S

S

S

S

*S= sensitive, R=resistant

 

Discussion

Catheter associated UTI is considered to be the most common UTI worldwide, accounting for up to 40% of nosocomial infections [26]. Presence of a urinary catheter is single most important risk factor for developing UTI. This is because of the lateral urethral pressure exerted by catheter which causes decreased mucosal blood flow, urothelial mucosal disruption & impaired mucin secretion. Also, in catheterised patients bladder is often incompletely emptied which serves as a nidus for infection. All these factors predispose to infection [26].

 

In this study female patients were found to be more commonly infected as compared to male patients with male to female ratio being 1:1.6, which is in accordance with the study conducted by Lundstrom et al. and Bukhary et al. [18, 20].This may be due to ascending infection from Candida colonising vulvovaginal area as a commensal. As far as different age groups are concerned, we found that highest incidence was among the patients of age group >60 years which is similar to the findings of various studies conducted by Yashavanth et al. and Jain et al. [10, 27-29]. This might be due to weaker immune system at an old age and hence lowered defences against infection. Results from this study thus indicate that female gender & older age (>60 years) are risk factors for developing CAUTI.

 

Isolation of Candida in CAUTI is a common finding [19, 30-32] and more so in ICUs. In this study prevalence of Candida causing CAUTI in ICU patients was found to be 23.12%. In other studies, prevalences were observed in between 18-26% which was almost similar to our study [33-36]. In the past few years, a shift of etiopathogenesis has been seen from Candida albicans to non-albicans Candida species [37]. In this study we also found that out of 34 positive cases 27(79.41%) were due to Non-albicans Candida and only 7(20.58%) were due to Candida albicans. In another study conducted by Jain et al. non-albicans Candida spp. (71.4%) was the predominant pathogen causing CAUTI [10]. Similar results were obtained in studies conducted by other authors like Yashavanth et al. and Iman et al. [28, 38]. Identification of Candida species is important as non albicans Candida are more resistant to azoles compared to that of C.albicans.

 

Antifungal susceptibility pattern depends largely on the infecting species of Candida. Fluconazole is an antifungal drug of choice for candiduira except for C.krusei because C.krusei is intrinsically resistant to fluconazole. All C.krusei isolates were thus found to be resistant to fluconazole in the current study also. Amphotericin B, with or without flucytosine, is recommended for treating symptomatic candiduria caused by fluconazole resistant Candida species [20, 39-41]. All Candida species were found to be sensitive to voriconazole, amphotericin B, caspofungin and micafungin in this study.

 

Limitations: Sample size in this study was small and such study with a large sample size will help in understanding the current trends of CAUTI better. Other risk factors for developing UTI like diabetes mellitus, other comorbidities, type of catheter material used and duration of catheterization were not assessed in the current study. Thus, further studies are required to asses role of such factors and address some unanswered questions.

 

Conclusion

The increasing burden of Candida associated CAUTI is causing large burden to both the healthcare system and patients. Though there are numerous antifungals available against Candida, species of Candida and risk factors in patient are determinant of the antifungal to be administered to the patient. Also changing pattern of Candida species causing UTIs around the world points towards continuous need for surveillance, thus helping us in providing appropriate therapy.

 

Conflicts of interest

Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

 

References

[1] Fisher JF, Sobel JD, Kauffman CA, Newman CA. Candida urinary tract infections-treatment. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 52:437–66.

 

[2] Behzadi P, Behzadi E, Ranjba R. Urinary tract infections and candida albicans. Cent Eur J Urol. 2015; 68:96–101.

 

[3] Bongomin F, Gago S, Oladele R, Denning D. Global and multi-national prevalence of fungal Diseases—Estimate precision. J Fungi (Basel). 2017; 3:57.

 

[4] Behzadi P, Behzadi E, Yazdanbod H, Aghapour R, Cheshmeh MA, et al. Urinary tract infections associated with Candida albicans. Maedica. 2010; 5: 277–279.

 

[5] Behzadi P, Behzadi E. The Microbial Agents of Urinary Tract Infections at Central Laboratory of Dr. Shariati Hospital, Tehran, IRAN. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci. 2008; 28:445.

 

[6] Urinary Tract Infections, In: Kapil A, Editor. Ananthanarayan and Paniker’s Textbook of Microbiology. 9th ed. Hyderabad: Universities Press (India) Private Limited; 2013.

 

[7] Forbes BA, Weissfeld AS, Sahm DF. Bailey and Scott diagnostic microbiology, 13th ed. 2013; pp.919–930.

 

[8] Bongomin F, Gago S, Oladele R, Denning D. Global and multi-national prevalence of fungal diseases—estimate precision. J Fungi (Basel) 2017; 3:57.

 

[9] Gharanfoli A, Mahmoudi E, Torabizadeh R, Katiraee F, Faraji S. Isolation, characterization and molecular identification of candida species from urinary tract infections. Curr Med Mycol. 2019; 5:33–36.

 

[10] Jain M, Dogra V, Mishra B, Thakur A, Loomba PS, et al. Candiduria in catheterized intensive care unit patients: emerging microbiological trends. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2011; 54:552–555.

 

[11] National Healthcare Safety Network. Device-associated module, Cauti: January 2014: available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/7psccauticurrent.pdf.

 

[12] Poudel CM, Baniya G, Pokhrel BM. Indwelling catheter associated urinary tract infection. J Instit Med. 2008; 30:3.

 

[13] Tumbarello M, Posteraro B, Trecarichi EM, Fiori B, Rossi M. Biofilm production by Candida species and inadequate antifungal therapy as predictors of mortality for patients with candidemia. J Clin Microbiol. 2007; 45:1843–1850.

 

[14] Helbig S, Achkar JM, Jain N, Wang X, Gialanella P, et al. Diagnosis and inflammatory response of patients with candiduria. Mycoses. 2013; 56:61–69.

 

[15] Kotb AF, Ismail AM, Sharafeldeen M, Elsayed EY. Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: the role of an antifungal regimen. Cent European J Urol. 2013; 66:196–199.

 

[16] Gajdács M, Dóczi I, Ábrók M, Lázár A, Burián K. Epidemiology of candiduria and candida urinary tract infections in inpatients and outpatients: Results from a 10-year retrospective survey. Cent Eur J Urol. 2019; 72: 209–214.

 

[17] Fazeli A, Kordbacheh P, Nazari A, Ghazvini RD, Mirhendi H, et al. Candiduria in hospitalized patients and identification of isolated candida species by morphological and molecular methods in Ilam, Iran. Iran. J Public Health. 2019; 48:156–161.

 

[18] Lundstrom T, Sobel J. Nosocomial candiduria:A review. Clin Infect Dis. 2001; 32:1602–1607.

 

[19] Kauffman CA, Vazquez JA, Sobel JD, Gallis HA, McKinsey DS, et al. Prospective multicenter surveillance study of funguria in hospitalised patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2000; 30:14–18.

 

[20] Abdulbaqi BZ; Candiduria: A review of clinical significance and management. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2008; 19:350–360.

 

Subscription